X Close

Out of the box . . .
Print
A A A

(FB093)
May 30, 2011

In Brief:

 

  • Detroit is generally regarded as the poster child for urban decay. 
  • The problem with Detroit is that not enough Americans want to live there.
  • Winnipeg could serve as a model to solve Detroit’s troubles.
  • Through the immigration sparked by the Manitoba Provincial Nominee Program, Winnipeg has revitalised itself, attracting immigrants and keeping them. 


Can the Winnipeg Model Save Detroit?

Revitalization strategy preferable to shrinking one

 

Detroit, not only in the US but across the globe, has become the poster child for urban decay. The city lost 25% of its population between 2000- 2010, and over half its population since 1950. Over 90,000 houses stand empty, and many neighbourhoods have been completely abandoned.
The burden of maintaining infrastructure and law enforcement in a city with an eroding tax base and sparse population has lead to attempts to “shrink” the city. This means bulldozing several areas of the city, and relocating existing residents. Current Mayor Dave Bing realizes this, and has pledged to knock down a staggering 10,000 structures during his first term. In the past such slum clearances lead to vigorous opposition from urbanists like Jane Jacobs, who argued that top down approaches to urban redevelopment would cause a great deal of pain, for little to no benefit. Yet despite the fact that Jacobs is widely admired by planners, the plan to shrink the city has met with little opposition in Detroit. Frankly, unless Detroit sees a major population surge, shrinking the city may sadly be necessary.
Recently, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press, and at one point mused about using immigration policy to repopulate the city. Bloomberg didn’t offer a substantive policy proposal, but the premise makes perfect sense. Most of Detroit’s problems stem from the fact that fewer and fewer people are working and paying taxes in the city. There is more infrastructure than people need or the city can afford.
Ultimately the issue then is getting people to live in Detroit. But the biggest problem, even with a mild resurgence in the auto sector, is that Americans, and even most Michiganders, don’t want to live in Detroit, even with jobs.
But for many immigrants, Detroit would seem like a major upgrade over their current living situation. This is not as far-fetched a notion as some may believe. Here’s a proposal for Detroit based on an unlikely Canadian immigration success story: Winnipeg.

View entire article as PDF (8 Pages)

Bookmark and Share


Related Items:

 



Author's Picture Steve Lafleur

 is a public policy analyst currently based out of Winnipeg. He recently graduated with a Master of Arts Degree in Political Science from Wilfrid Laurier University, and is a former Research Associate at the Cascade Policy Institute in Portland, Oregon. He is currently a Contributing Editor for NewGeography.com, where he writes about a variety of public policy issues relating to North American cities. His works have appeared in publications such as The Oregonian, The National Post, The Boston Globe, The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, and Reason Magazine.




Good Governance is Key with Chief David Crate - May 29, 2013


Upcoming Events

Good Governance is Key
with Chief David Crate
May 29, 2013 — Winnipeg

Dam-nation: Rolling the Dice on Manitoba’s Future
with Graham Lane
June 5, 2013 — Winnipeg



Upcoming FCPP Appearances

Visionary Conversations: Our Education System: The Good, the Bad, and the Solutions
Speaker: Rodney Clifton, Senior Fellow for Frontier Centre for Public Policy
Date: May 22, 2013
Time: 7:00 pm
Place: Robert B Schultz Theatre, St. John's College, University of Manitoba, Fort Garry Campus

Community Policy Forum
Speaker: Steve Lafleur, FCPP Policy Analyst
Date: May 28, 2013
Time: 7:00 - 9:00 pm
Place: Grant Park McNally Robinson, Winnipeg, Mb


Mon May 20, 2013

Link to Prairie Weather


SymbolCurrent Price
Canadian $0.9778
US $1.0227
S&P/TSX12613.05
Dow Jones13147.18
NASDAQ3498.965
Oil94.65
Uranium40.75
Potash43.65