 
November 9, 2010
In Brief:
Media Release - Having it Three WaysThe competing interest of the investor, customer and employee in Saskatchewan’s Crown Corporations
Regina: The people of Saskatchewan are simultaneously investors, customers and often employees of their Crown Corporations, and these roles have competing interests. A new Frontier Centre Policy Seriespaper Having it Three Ways, written by its Saskatchewan director David Seymour and released today argues that many policy debates on the Crowns neglect this basic fact to the detriment of all involved.
It is a logical fact that unless the Crowns are spectacularly productive performers year in, year out, then consistently above average benefits claimed from one point of view (for example good investment returns) must be costs from another point of view (for example customers or employees). Nevertheless, politicians and interest groups on all sides of the crown debate routinely fail to acknowledge this basic conflict, in effect asking to have their cake and eat it, too.
Like all businesses, Saskatchewan’s Crown Corporations are a meeting point for three groups. Investors own the capital, employees use it to provide goods and services, and customers consume themLike all businesses, Saskatchewan’s Crown Corporations are a meeting point for three groups. Investors own the capital, employees use it to provide goods and services, and customers consume them. In any company the three roles are in constant tension, each wishing for the best possible deal at the expense of the other two roles.
Investors would like to increase their returns at the expense of a poorer deal for either the customers or the employees. Customers would like the employees to work harder for less or the investors to provide more capital for lower returns (or both), so that they might get better services at lower prices. Employees, for their part, would like to improve their remuneration and conditions at the expense of the other two.
The paper goes on to argue:
If it is true that the roles are inevitably in conflict, Saskatchewan politicians have been able to juggle pressure from all three in recent years without acknowledging that a conflict exists.
“Five years ago the provincial government championed the Crowns as providing the ‘lowest cost bundle,’ an apparent victory for the customer role,” says the paper’s author. “This year we saw a policy of taking one hundred per cent of profits as a dividend to cover government expenditure. It is wrong to implement such policies without acknowledging that benefiting in one role means costs for another, but politicians from both parties have been able to get away with it too often.”
The paper concludes that the Crowns are subject to a “three way compromise” between investors, customers and employees, and that future discussions should automatically ask whether and to what extent any proclaimed benefits from the Crowns have come at the expense of the other two roles more than they have in the past.
Download a copy of Having it Three Ways Here .
For more information and to arrange an interview with the study's author, media (only) should contact:
David Seymour,
Director, Saskatchewan Office,
Frontier Centre for Public Policy
(306) 581-1007
Marco Navarro-Genie, Ph.D.
Research Director, Frontier Centre for Public Policy 403-995-9916 navarrom@fcpp.org
About the Author:
 Related Items:
is an independent public policy think tank whose mission is "to broaden the debate on our future through public policy research and education and to explore positive changes within our public institutions that support economic growth and opportunity." |
The Frontier Centre for Public Policy 
