X Close

A political party wants your vote and tends to say what you want to hear. The think tank is not looking for your vote so . . . .
Print
A A A

July 13, 2009

In Brief:

  • The Frontier Centre recommends rural municipalities adopt international best practice and charge the heaviest road users directly for the damage they cause
  • This would reduce inter-government wrangling over who should pay, but would require a revolution in rural municipalities’ capital asset management


Media Release - Better Accounting Could Solve Funding Headaches for Rural Roads

Rural municipalities all face a common problem of maintaining large road networks with a limited tax base. The result is constant political wrangling between RM’s and higher levels of government over who is responsible for funding maintenance of these roads.

The argument used by rural municipalities—that road users from outside their jurisdictions benefit from the use of their roads, so taxpayers from outside their jurisdiction should pay—is a valid one. In practice, this political process of deciding who-should-pay-for-what is seldom satisfactory for any party.

Other jurisdictions in other parts of the world, however, have short circuited this problem by seeking funding direct from the road users who necessitate the maintenance. Using the “exceptional user pays” principle, particularly heavy road users can be assessed for the disproportionate road damage their activities create and be charged accordingly.

The solution works because a very small number of heavy users can create a disproportionate amount of road damage; charging them spares local taxpayers.

“This solution,” says study co-author David Seymour, “eliminates the need for political wrangling between small cities and towns and higher levels of government over who should pay for road maintenance.”

“However, identifying the heaviest road users and working out what to charge them requires better asset management than is currently common in rural Canada. What is required is an integrated approach from engineering and accounting staff to assess the value of road usage.”

Download a copy of the Policy Series here: Text /main/publication_detail.php?PubID=2860

For more information and to arrange an interview with the study's author, media (only) should contact:

David Seymour
306-581-1007
seymourd@fcpp.org

Gary Slywchuk
Troy Media Corporation
gary.slywchuk@troymedia.com
403-835-8192

Bookmark and Share


Related Items:

  • Getting a Better Bang for the Pothole Buck

    Author's Picture The Frontier Centre for Public Policy

    is an independent public policy think tank whose mission is "to broaden the debate on our future through public policy research and education and to explore positive changes within our public institutions that support economic growth and opportunity."




  • Future Solutions for Retirement Security & Pensions with The Honourable Ted Menzies - June 27, 2013


    Upcoming Events

    Dams & Transmission Lines: Are There Responsible Alternatives?
    with Ed Schreyer, Former Governor General of Canada & Premier of Manitoba
    June 25, 2013 — Winnipeg

    Future Solutions for Retirement Security & Pensions
    with The Honourable Ted Menzies
    June 27, 2013 — Calgary



    Upcoming FCPP Appearances

    Watch for more appearances soon - to book a Frontier speaker for your community club or organization contact newideas@fcpp.org


    Thu June 20, 2013

    Link to Prairie Weather


    SymbolCurrent Price
    Canadian $0.9662
    US $1.035
    S&P/TSX12268.29
    Dow Jones13147.18
    NASDAQ3423.555
    Oil94.65
    Uranium40.10
    Potash40.93